Switch course ▾
Session 4. Deciding Under Constraints and Communicating the Decision
Objective. Use a short decision protocol with criteria, trade-offs and a simple budget, record why a decision was made, and write three versions of one message for staff, parents and the district or board.
School leaders rarely decide with enough money, time or authority. The temptation is to decide quickly and explain later, or to delay until a perfect answer appears. This lesson goes beyond the key ideas. It shows how to match the weight of a decision to how reversible it is, how to use scoring as a conversation tool rather than a calculator, and how to give bad news to staff, parents and the district without hiding the trade-off.
Key ideas
Start by sorting your constraints
- Every school leader decides with too little money, time or authority. First sort constraints into fixed (a rule you have checked, a date, a safety duty) and assumed ('we have never been allowed to').
- Check assumed constraints with one phone call or message to the district. Do not claim a regulation forbids something unless you have read it; say 'ministry regulations' only when you know which.
- A constraint you can name is a design brief. 'We have 3,000,000 som and six weeks' is more useful than 'we have no money'.
A decision protocol in six steps
- 1) Say the decision and who owns it. 2) List options, including 'do nothing' and 'do a smaller version'. 3) Choose three or four criteria such as benefit to pupils, cost, time, risk and fairness. 4) Consult the people affected. 5) Decide and write one paragraph of reasons. 6) Set a review date.
- Scoring options from 1 to 5 on each criterion does not give the answer by arithmetic; it shows where people disagree and why. Talk about the disagreement, not the total.
- Safety and legal duties come first and are not traded against convenience. Then compare the rest.
Trade-offs, opportunity cost and a simple budget
- Every yes costs a no. Spending 1,800,000 som on books means not repairing two windows or training twelve teachers. Write the cost of the option you did not choose next to the one you did.
- A simple budget table has four columns: item, cost, pupils or teachers reached, cost per person. It makes small and large costs comparable and is easy to show to a board.
- Time is a budget too. A new initiative costs meeting minutes, preparation and attention. Use 'one in, one out': when you add something, name what stops.
One decision, three audiences, and a one-page briefing
- Staff ask: why, what changes for me, when? Parents ask: what does it mean for my child, what do you need from me, whom do I call? The district or board asks: does it fit regulations and priorities, what is the evidence, what do you need?
- Use one structure for all: Situation, Decision, Reason, Next step, Ask. Give the same facts to everyone and change only the emphasis and the language level. Say what you know and what you do not know yet.
- A one-page briefing for a board: the ask in the first line, three lines of background, two or three options with trade-offs, your recommendation, cost and time, risks, next step. Bad news goes early and, for serious matters, in person.
A decision protocol
Reversible or hard to reverse?
Before you choose a process, ask whether the decision can be undone. Changing the bell schedule for two weeks as a trial is reversible: decide quickly, tell people it is a trial, and review. Moving a class to a different teacher mid-year or spending the entire fund is hard to reverse: slow down, consult those affected, and record your reasons.
A scoring grid helps the group see where people disagree. If one person gives 'risk' a 2 and another a 5 for the same option, that gap is the useful part of the meeting: ask each to explain. Do not add up the totals and announce the winner as if arithmetic decided. Then write the decision record in five lines and set a date to ask, 'Did it work?'
Three messages, one truth
The facts must be the same for staff, parents and the district; what changes is the first sentence. For staff, start with what changes in their week. For parents, start with what it means for their child and whom to ask. For the district or board, start with the request and the evidence. Use plain words and write for the language the reader uses, Uzbek or Russian.
Give bad news early and, when it is serious, in person. Name the trade-off honestly: 'We chose windows and the reading workshop; we did not buy costumes this year.' If you do not know something, say when you will know: 'I will tell you on Friday.' For a board, write one page: the request first, three lines of background, two or three options with trade-offs, your recommendation, cost, time, risks and next step.
Examples from the classroom
Cost per person
Scene. A Fergana school compares two options from a 3,000,000 som fund. Books cost 1,800,000 and reach about 120 pupils: 15,000 som per pupil. A reading workshop costs 900,000 for 12 teachers who teach about 300 pupils: 3,000 som per pupil and 75,000 per teacher. The head, Malika, does not choose by price alone, but the table shows that the workshop reaches more pupils and leaves money for repairs.
Insight. A four-column table makes unlike costs comparable and shows the trade-off in numbers.
A trial, not a decree
Scene. In Samarkand, deputy head Aziz wants to move the second break from 10 to 15 minutes. Teachers disagree. He proposes a two-week trial, with a one-line review: 'Are corridors calmer? Do lessons end on time?' After two weeks 17 of 22 teachers say yes. The change stays. Three older teachers who said no are thanked by name and asked to help set the bell times.
Insight. A reversible decision can be tested cheaply, which lowers fear and gives evidence for the final choice.
One message, three readers
Scene. Lessons on Friday must end 30 minutes early for two weeks because of roof repairs. Head Dilnoza in Bukhara writes: to staff, the changed bell times and who covers the duty; to parents, in Uzbek and Russian, the dates, what this means for their child and a phone number; to the district, the reason, the safety plan and a request for confirmation of dates. She also calls the three families who use after-school transport.
Insight. The same facts, three emphases, and a personal call for those most affected.
Common pitfalls
- Treating a rule as fixed without having read it.
- Adding up scores and announcing the winner as if arithmetic decided.
- Giving the district a different set of facts from the staff.
- Hiding the trade-off, so the people who lost out feel ignored.
The Small Fund Decision
- Open the Kit: a SAMPLE case with a fund of 3,000,000 som, five options, a decision record and a communication checklist. (5 min)
- Alone (10 min): sort the constraints into fixed and assumed. Score the five options 1 to 5 on four criteria.
- Trios (15 min): agree one package that fits the fund. Complete the decision record: decision, owner, reasons, the cost of what you did not choose, who you will consult, review date.
- Whole group (5 min): two trios present their package in 60 seconds. Others ask one question each about the cost of what was not chosen.
- Part B, One decision, three messages (20 min): alone, write 40 to 60 words each for staff, parents and the district, using Situation, Decision, Reason, Next step, Ask. Swap with a partner and check against the checklist.
- Alone (5 min): write your leadership task from the Kit.
Your facilitator will guide you through this activity in the session.
Questions to discuss
- Which assumed constraint, once checked, could change your package?
- What did you leave out of each message, and was it right to?
- Who would be most upset by your decision, and have you said that out loud to them?
Reflect
- What decision did you make recently that you could not explain in three sentences?
- Which constraint do you treat as fixed but have never checked?
- Which audience hears from you least often?
Try it tomorrow
- Take one decision this month and write whether it is reversible; if it is, try it for two weeks first.
- Make a four-column table (item, cost, people reached, cost per person) for any two options you are comparing.
- Write the three-line staff, parent and district versions of one decision in the order situation, decision, reason, next step, ask.
Further reading and links
Sort the constraints, compare options on clear criteria, write down why, and tell each audience what it needs to know.