Switch course ▾
Session 3. Rubrics Built with Pupils
Objective. Build a short rubric with pupils from examples of work, write observable level descriptions, and plan how pupils will use it for self- and peer-assessment before the work is handed in.
A rubric can be a tool for learning or a piece of paper that arrives after the marks. The difference is who helped make it and when pupils see it. When pupils compare strong and weak work and put the differences into their own words, they learn what quality is before they begin. Then the rubric becomes the language of self-checking and peer comments, and your marking becomes more consistent and faster.
Key ideas
Why many rubrics are ignored
- A rubric written by the teacher in words such as 'excellent', 'good', 'weak' is handed out at the end and read by nobody.
- Pupils cannot use words they do not understand, and levels with no observable difference ('some' versus 'many') cannot be applied.
- A rubric helps learning only when pupils understand it and use it while they work, not just when you mark.
What a good rubric looks like
- Three or four criteria (what matters most), three or four levels, and a short description in each box that says what you can SEE at that level.
- Describe quality, not only quantity: 'gives a reason for each point' is better than 'writes five sentences'.
- Keep it on one page and use words pupils themselves used when they discussed examples.
Building it with pupils: five moves
- 1. Show three anonymous pieces of work (weak, middle, strong; written by you or kept from earlier years). 2. Ask pupils to rank them and say why.
- 3. Collect the reasons on the board and group them into three or four criteria. 4. In groups, describe what each level looks like for one criterion.
- 5. Test the rubric by scoring the same three pieces with it. If the results differ from the ranking, rewrite the words that caused the difference. Goodrich Andrade describes a similar process.
Use it before the work is finished
- Before handing in, pupils colour or underline the rubric box that matches their work and point to the evidence in it.
- In pairs they give 'two stars and a wish', both tied to the criteria, and then revise for 5 to 10 minutes.
- Your own feedback can then point to a criterion ('look at the second row'), which links this session to the last.
Building a rubric with pupils
Criteria come from examples, not from slogans
Pupils usually know that a paragraph is better, long before they can say why. Showing three unnamed pieces and asking 'which is strongest and why?' turns that feeling into reasons. The reasons arrive in messy forms: 'it has more', 'it feels real', 'I can see it'. Your job is to help sort them into three or four criteria and to ask 'more of what?' until the answer can be observed.
This is where the rubric gets its words. A descriptor such as 'names several places or activities a reader can picture' came from pupils looking at a paragraph about a mahalla. It is easier to use than 'rich detail', and two teachers are more likely to read it the same way. Keep your own judgement about the standard: pupils help describe it, they do not set it.
A rubric is used before the mark
The biggest value of a rubric comes before submission. Ask pupils to mark the box that matches their work and to point to the sentence that proves it. If they cannot find evidence, they have found their next job. Then pairs give 'two stars and a wish' tied to a criterion, and revise for 5 to 10 minutes. The teacher's mark is then a check on work that has already been improved.
Keep the rubric short, with three or four criteria on one page. A long grid is hard to use while writing. If a criterion causes arguments, rewrite its descriptors using your anchor pieces, as in Session 4. Reuse good rubrics across tasks by changing only the content-specific descriptor, so pupils learn a stable language of quality over the year.
Examples from the classroom
My mahalla, Grade 5
Scene. Malika in Samarkand shows three unnamed paragraphs about a mahalla. Pupils rank them and give reasons: 'it names places', 'it says why they love it', 'sentences join'. Together they form three criteria and write what each level looks like. Before handing in, each pupil underlines the box that fits their paragraph and adds one sentence from their text as evidence.
Insight. Criteria built from examples use pupils' words, so they can apply them to their own work.
Experiment report in Grade 7
Scene. Aziz teaches natural science in Tashkent. For the plant-growth report he keeps two reports from last year without names. In 20 minutes pupils agree on three criteria: question and prediction, measurements with units, and a conclusion that uses the data. He prints them as a small card and pupils tick them in pairs before submitting.
Insight. Reusing anonymous work from previous years gives examples without extra writing.
A rubric that did not work
Scene. Jasur's first rubric for a Grade 6 oral talk had the level 'good: uses many details'. When pupils scored two recorded talks, they disagreed about 'many'. He asked pupils for what they could see: 'gives two examples from their own life'. The second version led to the same score from most groups.
Insight. Testing a rubric on real examples exposes words that cannot be applied, so you can replace them.
Common pitfalls
- Writing levels with vague words such as 'good', 'many' or 'weak'.
- Handing out the rubric only when marks are returned.
- Using ten criteria, so pupils cannot hold them in mind while working.
- Letting pupils set the standard alone instead of helping describe a standard you keep.
Build a Rubric from Examples
- Play the pupils. Read the three anonymous paragraphs (Grade 5, 'My mahalla') in your Activity Kit. Alone, rank them and write one reason for each ranking (8 min).
- In groups of four, put all reasons on the table and cluster them into three criteria. Name each criterion in pupil words (12 min).
- Write three level descriptions (starting, getting there, strong) for each criterion on the template. Use words you can see, not 'good' or 'weak' (15 min).
- Test: score the three paragraphs with your rubric. Does it give the same order as your ranking? Fix any words that caused a difference (10 min).
Your facilitator will guide you through this activity in the session.
Questions to discuss
- Which of your descriptors could two teachers read differently? How could you make it more visible?
- What did you notice when you had to work out the criteria from examples instead of being given them?
- Where in a real lesson would pupils use the rubric before handing in, and how many minutes will you give them?
Reflect
- Which assignment have you set recently where pupils did not know what a good answer looked like?
- Where could you find anonymous strong and weak examples for your next unit?
- What would a three-line rubric look like for one task you set next week?
Try it tomorrow
- Keep three anonymous pieces from last year, one for each level, to build a rubric next time.
- Build a three-line rubric with pupils in 20 minutes before your next written task.
- Ask pupils to underline the rubric box that fits their work and add a proof sentence before they hand in.
Further reading and links
Pupils understand a rubric they helped build, and use it while they work.