Switch course ▾
Session 4. Observation and Feedback Conversations
Objective. Observe a lesson for learning rather than judgement, write low-inference evidence notes, and lead a 20-minute feedback conversation that ends with one agreed next step.
Observation can feel like inspection, and feedback can feel like a verdict. If a beginner leaves a conversation defensive or flat, the mentor has lost the most useful tool they have. This lesson goes deeper than the key ideas: how to separate what you saw from what you think, and how to lead a short conversation in which the teacher does most of the thinking and leaves with one clear next step.
Key ideas
Observe to learn, not to judge
- Agree in advance: the lesson, the one focus (for example 'how pupils start work'), where you will sit and what you will write. No surprise visits.
- Be clear that this visit is not an evaluation. If a head of studies or inspector observes for appraisal, that is a different process; do not mix the two.
- Arrive on time, sit at the side, do not correct the teacher or pupils, and keep your face friendly and calm.
Evidence notes: facts, not verdicts
- Write what you can see and hear, with times: '10:05 teacher writes the task on the board; 10:06 six pupils start, ten look at the neighbour.' Avoid words like 'good', 'weak', 'bored'.
- Use three columns: time, what the teacher did, what the pupils did. Add a fourth for your questions ('why this order?').
- Fact: 'Nine pupils answered, all from the front two rows.' Opinion: 'The back rows were not interested.' Facts can be discussed; opinions start arguments.
A 20-minute feedback conversation
- Within one or two days, privately, with the teacher's tea or a quiet room. Start with the teacher: 'How do you think it went? What would you keep? What would you change?' (5 minutes).
- Then share one strength with evidence ('Pupils began within one minute because the task was already on the board') and one focus area with evidence and a question (5 minutes).
- Agree one next step: what the teacher will try, when you will look again, and what evidence you will both use. Write it down in one line (5 minutes).
When the feedback is hard
- Say it kindly but plainly; vague praise hides the problem. Use four steps: what I saw, what happened to the pupils, a question to the teacher, what we try next.
- Give one focus at a time. Five suggestions after one lesson are too many and are forgotten by evening.
- Keep the notes private. Do not use them for reports, rumours or the staff room without the teacher's agreement. A feedback habit survives only if it feels safe.
The observation cycle
From what you saw to what you think
Between an event and a judgement there are small steps. You see nine pupils speak, all from the front rows (fact). You decide the back rows are not interested (inference). You conclude that the lesson is weak (judgement). The teacher can agree with the fact; they will argue with the judgement, and they may be right to, because you did not see why the back rows were silent.
Write the fact in your notes, with the time and a number. Keep your inferences in a separate column or as a question: 'Why did only the front rows speak?' A test: could two observers agree this happened? If yes, it is a fact. Notes of this kind also protect the mentor, because they show that your questions come from what happened in the room.
A conversation the teacher can use
Ask the teacher to speak first. People often name the main issue themselves, and when they do, they own it. Then offer one strength with evidence, not general praise, and one focus with evidence and a question. Too many points are forgotten; one point leads to a change. End with a next step that says what the teacher will try, when you will look again and how you will both tell whether it worked.
If the teacher becomes defensive, slow down and return to the facts: 'Let me read what I wrote at 10:12.' If the problem is serious, say it kindly but plainly; vague praise hides it. Keep your notes private and be honest about your role: if you are asked to report on the teacher, say so before you observe.
Examples from the classroom
Fact or verdict
Scene. Mrs Saodat visits Dilnoza's Grade 3 reading lesson in Tashkent and writes 'class bored'. In the conversation she reads the note instead: '10:05 teacher reads aloud for six minutes; eight of thirty pupils look at the book.' Dilnoza says, 'I did not notice. I was worried about reading in time.' They agree on one thing: pupils read one sentence aloud in pairs in the first five minutes.
Insight. A fact invites the teacher to think; a verdict invites defence.
Teacher first
Scene. Jasur in Fergana expects his mentor to list problems with his Grade 7 lesson. She asks, 'How do you think it went?' Jasur says the group work was too long and pupils drifted. She had noted the same thing at 10:20 and shows it. Together they plan a 6-minute task with a written product. The mentor has said almost nothing new, and Jasur has found the idea himself.
Insight. When the teacher names the issue first, the next step is theirs and easier to keep.
Hard news, said plainly
Scene. Aziz, a Grade 4 teacher in Samarkand, repeatedly gives instructions twice and pupils start without understanding. His mentor says kindly, 'In this lesson I counted four times you gave the instruction and eight pupils asked their neighbour what to do. What do you think is happening?' Aziz sees it and they agree on a rule: write the three steps on the board.
Insight. Evidence stated kindly and plainly is easier to hear than vague praise followed by silence.
Common pitfalls
- Writing 'good', 'weak' or 'bored' in observation notes instead of what could be seen and heard.
- Listing five or six improvements after one visit, so nothing changes.
- Speaking first, which closes the conversation before the teacher says what they already see.
- Using observation notes for reports or staff-room talk without the teacher's agreement.
From Evidence Notes to a Feedback Conversation
- Pairs (10 min): open the Activity Kit and read the SAMPLE observation notes of a Grade 3 reading lesson. Underline every opinion word and rewrite three of them as facts with times.
- Pairs (10 min): from the notes, choose one strength and one focus area. Write each as a sentence with evidence, and one open question for the teacher. Decide the one next step.
- Trios (25 min, two rounds of 10 min plus 2 to 3 min feedback): role-play the 20-minute conversation, shortened to 10 minutes, using the script card. One is mentor, one is the beginner (Dilnoza in the sample), one observes and ticks the checklist. Rotate so that two people lead.
- Trios (5 min): discuss with the observer's checklist what helped the teacher think and what felt like an order.
- Second short activity, pairs (10 min): rewrite five judgemental comments from the Kit (for example 'Your questions are weak') into evidence plus a question. Check each against the test: could two observers agree this happened?
- Alone (5 min): write the school-based task from the Kit.
Your facilitator will guide you through this activity in the session.
Questions to discuss
- Which of your first notes were opinions in disguise?
- What did the teacher say when asked to speak first, and how did it change what you said next?
- What is the difference between feedback from a mentor and an evaluation by the head?
Reflect
- What was the most useful feedback you ever received, and who gave it?
- Which words do you use that sound like a verdict?
- What would make observation feel safe in your school?
Try it tomorrow
- Observe 15 minutes of a colleague's lesson with agreed focus and write notes in three columns: time, teacher, pupils.
- Ask 'How do you think it went? What would you keep? What would you change?' and listen for five minutes before you speak.
- End with one next step with a date, and write it in a single line that both of you keep.
Further reading and links
Collect facts, let the teacher speak first, give one strength and one focus, and agree one next step.