Switch course ▾
Session 5. The Two-Page Report and the Methodological Council
Objective. Write a two-page report, present it in eight minutes at a methodological council, answer hard questions calmly and turn the findings into a decision and a next step.
A study that stays in a drawer has changed nothing. The methodological council is where a teacher's careful work can become a school decision, but only if it is short, honest and clear about what you ask. Many good studies fail at this last step because they arrive as a long story with no request. Writing two pages and speaking for eight minutes forces you to decide what really matters.
Key ideas
The two-page report
- Six parts in this order: (1) the question in one sentence; (2) why it matters, three sentences; (3) what I did: pupils, design, instruments, ethics; (4) what I found: one table and one graph; (5) what this may not mean; (6) what I propose.
- Page one is words, page two is the table, the graph and the proposal. About 500 to 600 words, in the language of the school and without jargon.
- Write the summary last, in three sentences: what I found, how sure I am, what I ask. If the summary is vague, your study or your analysis is not finished.
Presenting in eight minutes
- A simple plan: 1 minute the problem, 2 minutes what you did, 2 minutes the result with one picture, 1 minute limits, 2 minutes your proposal. Then ten minutes for questions.
- One poster, board drawing or printed page is enough; no electricity needed. Give the council the two pages in advance or at the start so they can follow the numbers.
- Start with the finding, not the history. Say the result in one sentence, then show how you know. Rehearse once with a colleague and time yourself.
Hard questions, calmly
- A five-step reply: listen to the whole question; repeat it in your words; thank the person; answer from your evidence; say what you cannot say. 'I do not know, and here is how we could find out' is a strong answer.
- Expect: 'Was the class just more motivated?' 'Is the sample too small?' 'What does it cost in time?' 'Did the other class lose out?' Prepare a short, honest line for each.
- Do not defend your idea; defend your evidence. A result that shows no gain, or a small one, is still a finding the school can use, and honest reporting of it earns trust.
From findings to a decision
- End with a proposal the council can vote on: continue as a pilot, repeat with the classes swapped, adapt (shorten, change the task), extend to another grade, or stop. Say which you recommend and why.
- Agree a decision rule BEFORE the second block, for example: 'if the gain is larger again and pupils report no harm, we extend to the parallel grade.' It protects you from wishful reading.
- Close the loop: tell the pupils in plain words what you found, thank colleagues, record the council's decision, and delete the data as your plan says. Then the next question can begin.
From evidence to a council decision
Writing for busy colleagues
Your reader has a few minutes and many items on the agenda. Open with the question and the finding, in the first three lines. Then give only the evidence that supports it: one table and one graph, with the numbers visible. Put the method in a short paragraph that tells a colleague what they would need to repeat it: how many pupils, what you changed, which test, when.
Write the limits section as carefully as the result. Say what groups were small, which tests were used once, which other explanations you could not rule out. This is not weakness; it is what lets a reader decide how much to trust you. Finish with the proposal, one recommended decision and one alternative, in a sentence each. Read the page aloud to a colleague; anything they stumble over is too complicated.
Being asked, and deciding
Questions are a gift: they show what the council cares about. Listen to the end, repeat the question in your words, answer from your evidence, and say honestly what you do not know. If someone challenges the design, agree where they are right and show how the next block deals with it. Never take a question as an attack on your teaching; the study is about a method, not about you.
Agree what the council will decide and when. A decision rule made earlier, for example 'extend if the gain is larger again and pupils report no harm', protects everybody from wishful reading. Afterwards, write the decision down, thank the colleagues and pupils who took part, tell the pupils what you found in plain words, and delete the data as planned. Then the school is ready for the next question.
Examples from the classroom
The sentence that opened the talk
Scene. Malika in Tashkent opens her council talk with: 'In two Grade 5 classes, a 5-minute reading routine raised fluency scores by 6 words a minute against 3 for the usual lessons.' The room goes quiet and leans in. She then shows one table, names the small groups as a limit and asks for a second block with classes swapped.
Insight. Start with the finding in one sentence; the evidence then has a point to prove.
The hard question
Scene. At the council in Fergana, a deputy head asks Aziz whether his Grade 7 group was simply more motivated. Aziz thanks her, shows that the two classes started at the same mean, explains the coin toss and says that the swap in term two will test exactly this. The deputy head asks to see the results of the swap.
Insight. A well-prepared answer to an objection turns a critic into a partner.
No gain, still useful
Scene. Dilnoza in Samarkand finds that her paragraph frame did not change scores in Grade 5. She is disappointed but reports it plainly with the table, notes that pupils said the frame felt long, and proposes a shorter version for the next term. The council decides not to roll out the long frame and approves the test of the short one.
Insight. An honest null result saves the school time and points to the next step.
Common pitfalls
- Opening with a long history of theory before saying what you found.
- Hiding limits or other explanations so that the result looks stronger.
- Ending with 'more research is needed' instead of a specific request.
- Arguing for the idea in questions instead of showing the evidence.
Write the Two-Page Report and Rehearse the Council
- Open the Activity Kit: the six-part report frame, a SAMPLE weak draft, six council question cards and the observer sheet. (5 min)
- Pairs (15 min): read the weak draft against the checklist and find at least six flaws. Rewrite its three-sentence summary and its 'what this may not mean' part.
- Alone (10 min): outline your OWN two pages on the frame, using the study you have planned or already run. Write the three-sentence summary and the proposal.
- Trios, mock council (20 min): the presenter speaks for 3 minutes using the summary and proposal; the council member asks two tough questions from the cards; the observer fills the sheet and gives one strength and one change. Rotate three times.
- Second short activity, pairs (10 min): write the decision rule for your own study before the second block, and the two options the council could choose besides 'adopt'.
- Alone (5 min): write your school-based task from the Kit: date of the council, who is invited and what you will bring.
Your facilitator will guide you through this activity in the session.
Questions to discuss
- What was the single sentence that made your finding clear to your listeners?
- Which question was hardest to answer calmly, and what line will you use?
- What decision do you ask the council for, and what is your rule for deciding?
Reflect
- Who on your methodological council would take your study seriously, and who would doubt it?
- What would you do if your result showed no gain?
- What question will you take on next, and what did this study teach you about how to ask it?
Try it tomorrow
- Say your finding aloud in one sentence, then ask a colleague to repeat it in their own words.
- Time an eight-minute talk on your own study with a watch and cut anything that is not evidence or request.
- Write the decision rule for your study before the second block starts and date it.
Further reading and links
Two pages, one picture, honest limits, and a clear request that lets the council decide.