NITECNizomiy Innovative Teaching Excellence Center
Switch course ▾
5.1 Understanding How Students Learn5.2 Lesson Planning Fundamentals5.3 Classroom Management5.4 Student Engagement5.5 Assessment Fundamentals5.6 Differentiated Instruction5.7 Communication with Students & Parents5.8 Digital Teaching Fundamentals5.9 AI Literacy for Teachers5.10 Reflective Teaching Practice6.1 Multilingual Classrooms: Uzbek, Russian & English Instruction6.2 Teaching Large Classes Effectively6.3 Early Literacy & Numeracy Foundations6.4 Classroom Technology Basics6.5 Working with Parents in a Multicultural Community6.6 Wellbeing & Stress Management for New Teachers8.1 Advanced Assessment & Feedback8.2 Learning Analytics8.3 Inquiry-Based Learning8.4 Project-Based Learning8.5 Critical Thinking8.6 Differentiation & Inclusion8.7 AI-Enhanced Teaching8.8 Curriculum Design8.9 Student Motivation8.10 Action Research9.1 Teaching STEM through Inquiry9.2 Arts & Creativity Integration9.3 Environmental & Sustainability Education9.4 Blended & Flipped Classroom Design9.5 Supporting Multilingual Learners9.6 Gamification & Game-Based Learning11.1 Instructional Coaching11.2 Mentoring Beginning Teachers11.3 Advanced Pedagogical Design11.4 Evidence-Based Teaching11.5 Classroom Research11.6 Learning Analytics for Improvement11.7 AI Innovation in Education11.8 Designing Professional Learning11.9 Peer Observation11.10 Leading Classroom Innovation12.1 Coaching Colleagues Through Instructional Rounds12.2 Data-Informed School Improvement12.3 Designing Assessment for National/International Benchmarks12.4 Leading a Professional Learning Community12.5 AI Tools for Personalized Learning at Scale12.6 Special Educational Needs & Inclusive Pedagogy14.1 Educational Leadership14.2 Instructional Leadership14.3 Teacher Development Systems14.4 School Improvement14.5 Leading Educational Innovation14.6 Strategic Use of AI14.7 Education Research & Policy14.8 Coaching & Mentoring Systems14.9 Professional Learning Communities14.10 Change Management in Education15.1 Education Policy & Systems Thinking15.2 Building a Teacher Training Curriculum15.3 Grant Writing & Resourcing School Innovation15.4 International Benchmarking: AITSL, NIE & PISA Frameworks15.5 AI Governance & Ethics in Schools15.6 Scaling Innovation Across a School NetworkProgramme (64) →

Session 3. Budget, Timeline, Risk and Sustainability

Objective. Build a budget in which every line is linked to an activity and justified, plan a realistic timeline around the school year, write a short risk register, and explain how the work will continue when the grant ends.

Why this matters

A budget, a timeline and a risk register are three views of one thing: how your plan will meet reality. Reviewers read them quickly and learn a lot. A careful budget shows you understand your own work; a timeline that respects Navruz and exams shows you know your school; honest risks show you will not be surprised. This session gives you simple tools to build all three and to explain what continues after the grant ends.

Key ideas

A budget is the plan written in numbers

  • Every line must match an activity in the logic model. If a cost cannot be tied to an activity, remove it or explain it. Reviewers use the budget to check whether you understand your own project.
  • Write each line as quantity x unit cost x time = total, in a table anyone can check with a calculator. Use real prices from price lists or written quotes, not guesses. Arithmetic errors make the whole application look careless.
  • Add a justification sentence per line: 'Books: 150 at 40,000 so'm lets each pupil borrow 1 book per week.' Avoid vague lines such as 'miscellaneous' and avoid padding. A small, stated contingency is acceptable only if the funder allows it.

Cash, in-kind and what the funder will not pay

  • Show two columns: requested from the funder and contributed by the school and partners. Teacher time, a room and volunteer hours have value; list them as in-kind with a simple basis, such as 4 teachers x 2 hours x 30 weeks = 240 hours.
  • Read the rules on eligible costs. Many funders do not pay for costs incurred before the award, for ordinary salaries, or for large equipment. A good budget never hides an ineligible cost under another name.
  • Check money against the logic model. A laptop for the head's office is not an activity of a reading project, however useful it would be.

A timeline and a risk register that fit a real school year

  • Lay out the project month by month: when funds arrive, when goods are bought, when teachers are trained, when each check happens. Mark the holiday periods, Navruz, end-of-year exams and the months when the building is used for other purposes.
  • Funds often arrive later than hoped. Build a gap between award and first purchase, and never start work that depends on money you do not yet have in writing.
  • A risk register lists 4 to 6 risks, each with likelihood (low, medium, high), impact, one action to reduce it and a named owner. Typical school risks: late funds, price rises, a trained teacher leaving, low parent support, damaged books.

Sustainability: what happens in year two

  • Funders ask: when the grant ends, what continues and who pays? Separate one-off costs (shelves) from running costs (printing, replacing worn books) and show how the school will cover the running costs.
  • The strongest sustainability is not money but habit: a routine in the timetable, trained teachers who train others, materials copied locally, a parent group that keeps the library open. The EEF stresses that how an innovation is prepared, delivered and sustained often decides whether it works.
  • Be honest. Promising that the ministry or a company will pay from year two, without their written agreement, is a risk, not a plan.

Two kinds of cost

One-off costs

Year 1 only

  • Shelves and mats
  • Training workshops
  • First set of books

Running costs

Every year

  • Printing check sheets
  • Replacing worn books
  • Refreshing the training
Ask in the budget which column each line belongs to, and who pays the second.

Estimating costs without guessing

Start from activities, not from money. For each activity list what is needed: people's time, materials, space, transport, printing, repairs, food at workshops. Then price each item from a price list or a written quote, and write the date, because prices move. Check for hidden costs that are easy to forget: delivery, translation into Uzbek and Russian, extra copies, replacement of worn items, and the time of the person who keeps the records.

Use a sanity check: divide the total by the number of pupils or teachers who benefit. In the sample project, 10,290,000 so'm for 96 pupils is about 107,000 so'm per pupil. This does not prove the budget is right, but a figure ten times larger or smaller than similar projects invites a question you should be ready to answer.

Sustainability is mostly habit and people

Think of four kinds of sustainability: routines (the reading hour is in the timetable), people (more than one teacher knows how to run it), materials (the school can print or copy what is needed) and money (a named source covers running costs). A project that depends on one enthusiastic teacher is fragile; two trained teachers and a one-page routine card already lower the risk.

Write an exit plan that a funder can read in five lines: what ends, what continues, who is responsible, what it will cost in year two and where that money comes from. If a source is only hoped for, say so, and show what you will do without it. Honest limits are more convincing than a promise that cannot be checked.

Examples from the classroom

The per-pupil check

Scene. Aziz's school in Fergana requests 18,000,000 so'm for a Grade 6 maths club for 24 pupils. Dilnoza, who reads drafts for the cluster, divides: 750,000 so'm per pupil. She asks which lines make the cost high. Two items are a printer and a projector that every subject would use. Aziz moves them to the school's own budget and the request falls.

Insight. A simple division reveals lines that are not tied to the project. Moving them honestly makes the request more credible.

The teacher who left

Scene. A Samarkand school plans a reading hour led by one trained teacher, Malika. In November she moves to another city. The project stops for six weeks. In the next application the school trains two teachers, writes a one-page routine card and names a methodist as owner of the risk 'trained teacher leaves'.

Insight. A risk register is useful when it changes the plan: training two people costs little compared with a six-week stop.

Year two with a parents' group

Scene. In a Bukhara school, the running cost of the library is 800,000 so'm for replacing books and 300,000 so'm for printing. Jasur asks the parent committee to take the first line, with a monthly list of books to replace, and the school covers printing from its own funds. Both agree in a short signed note kept in the project folder.

Insight. A named payer with a written agreement turns 'sustainability' from a hope into a plan.

Common pitfalls

  • Adding a vague 'miscellaneous' line or padding every price to be safe.
  • Putting equipment that the whole school uses into one small project.
  • Planning activities for months when the building or the pupils are not available.
  • Promising that someone else will pay from year two without their written agreement.
Hands-on activity · ~65 min

Fix the Budget, Draw the Year, Face the Risks

  1. Open the Activity Kit: a SAMPLE draft budget with problems, an empty month-by-month grid for a school year, a risk register template and a year-two cost sheet. (5 min)
  2. Alone (10 min): check the draft with a calculator. Find the arithmetic error, the line not tied to an activity, the vague line and the missing costs. List them.
  3. Pairs (15 min): rewrite the budget as a table with quantity, unit cost, total, and a one-sentence justification per line. Show the in-kind contribution in a separate column.
  4. Pairs (10 min): fill the month grid from September to June. Mark holidays, Navruz and exams, then place purchases, training and each reading check where they can really happen.
  5. Part B, Risks and year two (20 min): write five risks with likelihood, impact, action and owner. Then use the year-two sheet to calculate the running cost and name who will pay each part. Decide which risk you would tell the funder about openly.
  6. Alone (5 min): write your leadership task from the Kit.

Your facilitator will guide you through this activity in the session.

Questions to discuss

  • Which problem in the draft budget would a funder notice first, and which would a school colleague notice first?
  • What did the real school calendar do to your timeline?
  • Which year-two cost has no owner yet, and what will you do about it?

Reflect

  • When did a cost you forgot in the plan hurt a project at your school?
  • What in your school is paid for by someone's unpaid time, and is it written down anywhere?
  • Which good practice at your school would stop if one person left?

Try it tomorrow

  • Take any school purchase from last year and check it with quantity x unit cost x time.
  • Draw a ten-month grid with Navruz, exams and holidays and place your project's first three steps.
  • List what would continue in your project if the money stopped tomorrow, and who would do it.

Further reading and links

Key takeaway

A good budget, timeline and risk register show a funder that you understand your own plan and will not be surprised by year two.